BusinessReport.com

Posted on December 13 at 12:50 p.m.

The opposition to Rouzan has not taken into account the economics of TNDs versus a single A neighborhood. Rouzan, under Spinosa's plan, has 23 acres of greenspace, which would be available to the folks who live in Southdowns.

If he reduced density and eliminated retail, he would eliminate his profit. That would make another single-a subdivision his only option to earn money.

If so, the people would get no greespace, as well as straight roads that spark speeding through Southdowns instead of curved ones in a TND that slow cars down.

Under Single-A, there would be no school, no library, no church, no local cafe or deli. Does the opposition really want that?

This is Councilman Skyring's fault. He flipped last night after clearly stating even before his election that he would prefer a TND there.

Culbertson should retire to his house in CCLA and never emerge.

Carter deserves no praise, for he has been an embarrasment to his constinuents ever since he was elected. He couldn't even beat Bob Odom, the worst politician since Edwin Edwards.

On What now?