Every legislator a king

Every legislator a king

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Well, looky here, there's suddenly money for everyone in our ever-expanding state budget now that legislators have gotten theirs.

Just 24 short hours after our part-time public servants decided that being a member of the House or Senate is not just a job, it's a high-paying adventure, legislators stopped watching LSU baseball's ninth-inning heroics long enough to go on a spending spree typically reserved for drunken sailors.

A Senate finance committee restored millions of dollars for health care and education faster than Blake Dean's game-winning, three-run double slammed off Rosenblatt Stadium's left field wall.

Gov. Bobby Jindal, who claims to vehemently oppose legislators instantly doubling their own salary but won't do a damn thing about it, said there's your quid, and Senators responded with a pro quo that includes returning the $100,000 Rep. Hunter Greene cut from LED Secretary Stephen Moret's salary and hiking the pay of several other Jindal political appointees.

Always willing to take care of themselves, the committee wrapped up the day by pumping up the pork in their districts, earmarking cash for such things as fairs, festivals, museums, religious charities and nonprofits. The Baton Rouge area alone got $2.1 million in newfound love.

What’s comical, I guess, is that much of the Senate's largesse restored money that earlier had been slashed by the House. In fairness, the House made those cuts back in those halcyon days when underpaid and overworked legislators were concerned with such things as restraining the growth of state government and eliminating the practice of spending "one-time" surplus revenue on recurring expenses.

What were those crazy kids thinking back then?

Following the public outcry over legislators first proposing to triple their pay and then agreeing to double it, the response appears to be this: Let's throw taxpayer money at the problem. Which, of course, follows in the great populist tradition of a chicken in every pot and an NGO grant for every angry voter.

Seriously, if you've got a funding request now's the time to ask.

I guess the cliché is true, "The more money a legislator makes, the more money a legislator spends." Or, as The Notorious B.I.G. rapped, "Mo' money, mo' problems."

What I can't decide is what's funnier: legislators—or leges, for short—believing they can spend their way out of trouble, or the back-peddling explanations many are offering to angry constituents?

Take Rep. Erich Ponti, the Baton Rouge Republican, who called to complain my last column ["Return of the banana republic"] made it appear as if he favored a massive pay hike when he really opposed it. I promised I'd set the record straight, so here goes:

Ponti says that despite his yea vote in committee supporting the tripling of legislative salaries, he really didn't support the bill but voted for it only so that it could be debated by the full House. Then, after there was exactly zero debate allowed before the full House, Ponti voted against any pay raise. Yet Mr. Ponti's name is nowhere to be found on the list of legislators who have agreed not to accept the salary-doubling raise.

(For the record, area legislators not accepting the $20,700-a-year raise are: Rep. Clif Richardson, Greenwell Springs; Sen. Jody Amedee, Gonzales; and Sen. Bill Cassidy, Baton Rouge. That's it, that's the list. )

So, here's the translation of the clarification: Ponti voted in favor of a pay raise he didn't support, then voted against a pay raise he's accepting.

OK, so maybe Republican House Speaker Jim Tucker was right when he said, "If we're going to have an educated, qualified Legislature, you have to have decent pay."

Just as bizarre is the response of Gov. Jindal, who promised 2 million voters on the campaign trail he would "prohibit" legislators from giving themselves a pay raise that took effect immediately. Rather than honor the pledge and veto a raise he claims to oppose, Jindal says he'll do nothing and let the bill simply become law.

What? Jindal and his supporters argue that legislators threatened to derail his agenda if he derailed their raise and that succumbing to extortion is a necessary evil to keep the hope of a better Louisiana alive.

One problem (among many) with this logic: Stuff like this pay raise and the sleazy way in which it was handled is exactly why residents of this banana republic have so little hope in the first place.

So if pretty much everyone in the state opposes the pay raise why would leges so brazenly give it to themselves?

Maybe they're guessing most will forget by the time elections roll around in three-plus years. (I seriously doubt that's the case based on some of the creative Photoshop work recently spotted on the Internet.)

Maybe it’s because the ethics reform measures passed earlier this year cut so deep into the way leges have historically made money that they're left with no other way to make ends meet.

After all, somebody's got to pay for that S500 Mercedes Benz in Sen. Ann Duplessis' parking spot. Right?

And who better than the taxpayers of the great state of Louisiana?

Such political arrogance hasn't been spotted in these parts since The Kingfish, Huey Long, was at the height of his populist power. Not even Edwin Edwards had the onions to pull something like this. Rather, he made his money the old fashioned way—kickbacks.

Which is why we close today with a song, inspired by The Kingfish himself, in tribute to the greed and sleaze of our friends in the Legislature.

So, with apologies to Gov. Long and Randy Newman, please join in the singing of "Every Lege A King:"

Why weep or slumber in Baton Rouge

Land of L-S-U

With billions in spending and NGOs

All from us to you

Evry lege a king, evry lege a king,

For we should all be millionaires

There's a pay raise belonging to all of us

There's enough for tax-payers to share

When it's sunny June and December too

Or in the winter time or spring

There'll be cash without end

Even Jindal's our friend

And evry lege a king!

[Editor's note: To hear Mr. Newman's original version, or to sing along with the new lyrics, click here.]


Comments

Posted by LSUTIGERSFAN on June 19, 2008 at 1:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So because of the current and alleged low rate of pay, Am I supposed to conclude from Mr. Tucker's comments that the current legislature (Tucker included) is is unqualified and uneducated?

Posted by Chasa on June 19, 2008 at 2:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Excellent column, JR. It appears that the high hopes the desperate citizens of Louisiana had for Jindahl are going the way of our unprotected shoreline. With billions of surplus revenue available the legislature divided the spoils and left the state to erode. It is typical of Louisiana politicians.

I hope the voters here and in the rest of the country see the false promises of reform promised by candidates to be exactly that, false promise. Do you believe Obama?

Posted by intrepidtraveler on June 19, 2008 at 3:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

All animals are equal....but some animals are more equal than others.

Posted by jsanderssr on June 19, 2008 at 3:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Leges who are ethically challenged and a wormy little governor who's testiculary challenged. The gret stet of looziana lives on...

Posted by fourx5 on June 19, 2008 at 4:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Tucker said: "If we're going to have an educated, qualified Legislature, you have to have decent pay."

What, are they all going to go to "Good Government School" now that they've got raises and can pay for it?

I'm chagrined that you haven't raked Bobby over the coals for going back on his word - his brochure promised to veto any legislative pay raises that took effect during the same term. And yet, here's the GOP wonder boy, destroying in a single stroke every single ounce of goodwill and trust he'd built up in Louisiana by indicating he "doesn't agree", but "won't veto".

I guess criticizing Jindal is a little taboo, what with your Rolfe paying for a radio spot that directly controverts the facts?

Posted by jackrlst on June 19, 2008 at 4:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Great column, I am just so frustrated with these fools I don't know what to do. I wrote the Advocate expressing appreciation for those who opposed the raise ( yeah even those who voted against but accepted it). I hope everyone keeps a list of these votes I have and remember down the road. SAD DAY FOR LA. I JUST HOPE JINDAL HAS THE B _ _ _ _
TO USE HIS VETO PIN ON THE SLUSH FUNDS, EXCUSE ME N G O FUNDS.

Posted by fourx5 on June 19, 2008 at 6:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Here's a tidbit for those who want to see young, smart computer professionals stay in the state:

Top 10 science and technology states

1. Massachusetts
2. Maryland
3. Colorado
4. California
5. Washington
6. Virginia
7. Connecticut
8. Utah
9. New Hampshire
10. Rhode Island

'....Rounding out the bottom of the list were Louisiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, West Virginia, and Mississippi."

Good thing the lege is working on rewarding themselves instead of advancing the interests of a state that relies on a 19th-century economy and education system. Good luck with that.

Posted by fourx5 on June 19, 2008 at 6:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Forgot the best part of the story:

"The lead author of the study, Ross Devol, said states that are investing in science and technology assets are the same states that have a vision and plan for retaining high economic growth. Researchers also said, compared to information from the 2004 report, regional competition for technology industries is on the rise, due to global competition from China and India."

But hey - go ahead and pass some fantasy Intelligent Design bill - that way, kids in Louisiana public schools will get even LESS time to study the science curriculum they need to compete.

Why the whole state isn't marching on the capitol to straighten out the priorities of these bums is beyond me.

Posted by indiansue on June 20, 2008 at 10:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

You are a talented writer who has done his homework. I am new to this site, recommended by someone else. I hope informers like yourself will encourage the citizens of this state to become involved and make those we elect act responsibly. I am fed up with the lies and deceit in my government both state and national.
I have never been an activist but am rapidly becoming one, having been pushed, by the decisions of this legislature and our lame duck governor.

Posted by NewOrleansLady on June 22, 2008 at 10:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I was a huge Bobby Jindal supporter... that is until his decision to travel to D.C. in the attempt to override President Bush's veto on the SCHIP expansion bill. That move set off a series of alarms that made me start questioning just how conservative Jindal really was. Don't get me wrong, he SAYS all the right things-- but then again... TALK IS CHEAP, eh?

Governor Jindal has a DUTY to veto bills that are bad for the state and/or the citizens of Louisiana. If he is not willing to fulfill that obligation then he needs to step aside and let someone else, whom has a pair, do the business of protecting the taxpayer's money!! (BTW, I am a female professional so please don't bother accusing me of making a "sexist" statement.. :)

Posted by fourx5 on June 24, 2008 at 1:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I can't see how anyone gives your opinion any weight when you're employed by a connected Jindal acolyte.
Seriously - at what point does the Baton Rouge power/opinion structure have any independent articulation? It sure a'int here.

Posted by Undone on June 24, 2008 at 6:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I was also a Jindal supporter and had great hopes for him. His argument that he could not get his reform passed if he did not participate in this scam has no merit. He was elected with enough vote to have received a mandate from the citizens of this state. I am sorry he will allow this issue to define his political career. His lack of courage and intestinal fortitude speaks volumes. The silence of the veto pen will be deafening. Surely those who advise him are giving him better counsel than to go against the will of the people. I'm certain he will make a fine professor at some liberal university after he becomes a four year letterman in the governors office.

Posted by JHouse1016 on June 30, 2008 at 4:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Wow everybody, way to jump the gun before the time ran out. Jindal vetoed the bill and this was all for nothing.

Post a comment

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Story Extras

Poll

Do you believe Gov. Bobby Jindal's decision not to renew an executive order that specifically bans discrimination against gays and lesbians in the workplace will hurt the state's economic development efforts?

See Results | Archives



Click Here for Great Deals