All the usual downtown folks were crowded into the lobby of Kress @ Third & Main on Jan. 25 for the official unveiling of Plan Baton Rouge Phase II, the newest update of downtown’s master plan. Several officials took to the podium to tout their excitement, in a time-to-roll-up-our-sleeves sort of way.
City-Parish Administrator Mike Futrell pledged to work on the plan “right away.” Downtown Development District Chairman Van Mayhall Jr. called it “a great plan to start off with” but noted there was “still a lot of work to be done.”
“Plan Baton Rouge Phase II heralds a new wave of economic development downtown,” DDD Director Davis Rhorer says.
That’s the hope, anyway. The biggest disappointment of the first Plan Baton Rouge was that the successful projects didn’t spur much residential growth. Only about 2,000 people live within the DDD boundaries, and almost everyone who cares about downtown agrees residential development is the biggest need this time around.
The original plan envisioned “liner” buildings on the sites of some of downtown’s uglier parking lots. The parking would have been maintained on the first floor, with housing above, adding residents while filling in gaps in the streetscape. But no one could figure out how to make the numbers work financially.
Advertisement | Advertising
It’s expensive to build downtown, which means it’s expensive to live there. “Some day, Baton Rouge’s downtown may have the cachet required to pass these higher development costs on to the homebuyers but, at present, it does not,” the Plan Baton Rouge Phase II report says.
The plan suggests creating a low-interest revolving loan fund, or “mezzanine” fund, to spur the market. John Alschuler, head of strategic economic planning for the consultant team, says the fund might start out with $10 million, gathered from government, foundations or private sources. A developer would still need a traditional loan; the ratio might be $1 from the mezzanine fund for every $3 on the construction loan. Once the ball gets rolling, the market creates its own momentum and the fund could be phased out. Of course, this idea requires someone putting up the money: the Redevelopment Authority, perhaps?
“I don’t want to say too much at this point,” Rhorer says. “We’re going to every place we possibly can to seek out the funding to make it happen.”
Other targeted incentives can make a difference without costing millions, Center for Planning Excellence Vice President Rachel DiResto says. Property tax abatements, for example, wouldn’t require huge revenue outlays. But does the public want to see that kind of support—some would call it favoritism—for downtown?
“There is a lot more work to be done to have people understand how having a healthy core leads to a healthy city,” DiResto says, a point she hopes is at the forefront of the discussions around the city-parish’s new comprehensive planning process that kicked off Jan. 26.
Loan fund or not, living downtown will probably always be more expensive than living in a comparable space elsewhere. Most people will want better amenities to make the higher costs worth it. And while grocery stores aren’t likely to come until the people do, the public sector can start working now on better green spaces and solving the parking conundrum.
More than half of downtown’s 6,500 parking spaces are not publicly accessible, the plan says, suggesting the city could work with private lot owners and the state to manage the use of those spaces for everyone’s benefit. The original bonds that financed the state-owned parking structures restrict public uses, but as those bonds expire, agreements could be worked out for public use of the excess spaces, the plan says.
In theory, the DDD could be the city’s parking authority, although it may not have that capacity now with its budget of less than $600,000. Mayhall is putting a committee together to figure out what the DDD should look like as it moves into the next 20 years to accommodate the more robust role the plan envisions.
The ideas in the report are not new. Some have been around for decades. Others have been trickling out since this planning process started in 2008, through public meetings, draft reports and media interviews with the consultants. A number of the plan’s suggestions, such as converting St. Louis and St. Ferdinand streets for two-way traffic, are already progressing.
But having everything together in a single document can help when it comes time to ask for money. Futrell, a former state legislator himself, says the plan shows the local legislative delegation how a particular request fits into an overarching theme that’s supported by city-parish leaders.
“When you see how [a project] fits into an overall plan, and how all the various projects add up, it starts to make more sense,” DiResto says. “It gives certainty to the private sector, because it shows public sector buy-in.”
Chan Krieger Sieniewicz, a prominent urban design and planning firm based in Cambridge, Mass., led the consultant team. Local consultants included economist James Richardson and WHLC Architecture. The city, DDD, Fannie Mae, CPEX, Baton Rouge Area Foundation, Downtown Business Association and Baton Rouge Area Convention & Visitors Bureau were the primary sponsors.
Assuming the Planning Commission and Metro Council approve, the plan eventually will be incorporated into the parish’s overall land use plan. Public meetings for the overall plan will be held March 2 and March 4.
PLANNING AHEAD
Some of the proposals in Plan Baton Rouge Phase II include:
THE URBAN FOREST
Short term: Expand the arborist department and staff
Medium term: Plant trees along Laurel Street, River Road, St. Ferdinand and St. Louis streets
Long term: Plant trees along all downtown streets
THE CENTRAL GREEN
Short term: Create a detailed redesign of the River Center landscape
Medium term: Improve the waterworks site on River Road
Long term: Build a pedestrian bridge from the Shaw Center to the Louisiana Art & Science Museum
CAPITOL PARK
Short term: Extend Capitol Lake Drive to DeSoto Park
Medium term: Establish a pedestrian connection at Capitol Park Welcome Center to DeSoto Park over River Road
Long term: Complete a loop trail around Capitol Lake
MIXED-USE CORE
Short term: Empower and fund the DDD to manage the public realm within downtown
Medium term: Allow shared use of state-owned parking garages
Long term: Redevelop the Baton Rouge Police headquarters in Beauregard Town
THIRD STREET
Short term: Secure a site at the north end of Third Street for a mixed-use entertainment anchor
Medium term: Improve the Third Street streetscape
Long term: Codify the branding and identity of the district
HOUSING
Short term: Establish loan fund and tax abatements for developers
Medium term: Invest in the public realm to improve the experience for residents and visitors
Long term: Sunset housing financing when no longer needed
PARKING STRATEGY
Short term: Negotiate with state for access to state-owned parking structures
Medium term: Develop time-limited leases and permits to maximize shared parking in public structures
Long term: Construct public parking as part of mixed-use high-density developments
NEW ‘VICTORY PARK’
Short term: Acquire parking area next to the Post Office for redevelopment
Medium term: Improve condition of the 7th and Napoleon streets corridor
Long term: Redevelop other park, housing and office sites
DOWNTOWN AND RIVER
Short term: Narrow River Road for better pedestrian access
Medium term: Develop DeSoto Park
Long term: Construct bridge between Shaw Center and LASM
DOWNTOWN AND ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS
Short term: Redesign Laurel and Lafayette streets for two-way traffic
Medium term: Improve South Boulevard so that it is comparable to North Boulevard
Long term: Make all downtown streets two-way except North, Main and Third
FUTURE TRANSIT
Short term: Invest in shuttle service between LSU and downtown
Medium term: Plan future transit mode for Nicholson corridor, possibly light rail
Long term: Relocate CATS bus transfer closer to downtown



Comments
Posted by phil on February 9, 2010 at 5:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I have read the plan. Without getting into details, I personally believe some parts are possibly good and some parts are not very feasible. Unfortunately, it appears that the development of DeSoto Park and the Alive project are still part of the plan for downtown, since Alive is still mentioned in the plan.
I hope everyone will take the time to read the plan, or at least the main parts of the plan, including the last page which addresses funding.
While I realize some planning is necessary for a large city, perhaps it is time for someone to perform a study of how many plans have been performed in recent years, and how much the total costs for the plans have been.
Posted by phil on February 9, 2010 at 6:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This is more of a question than a comment. Will the conversion of one way steets to two way traffic actually result in less parking spaces downtown? I used to live downtown and if I remember correctly some streets are not wide enough to safely allow for both two way traffic and parking on one side of the street.
Posted by Being_Stupid on February 10, 2010 at 8:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The DDD & Planning Staff want to encourage more residential development on the outskirts of Downtown???
Whatever?
When Richard Preis and David Slaughter tried to develop a new townhouse development a couple months ago, they were met with fierce opposition from the HPC and Spanish Town Neighborhood Association and provided no support by the Metro Council or DDD.
Richard Preis had to hire a lawyer to represent himself against the HPC. David Slaughter finally gave up on the idea of developing that part of Baton Rouge. This all costs money that builds absolutely nothing.
One side of our government is trying to encourage development, but the other side throws up roadblocks and offers no support to developers to implement their developments.
The same people that try to encourage development also stop it with all the bureaucracy they create. The Planning Staff, Planning Meetings, Neighborhood Groups and especially some in the Metro Council are the main culprits of stopping development of Baton Rouge. It is way too much BUREAUCRATIC red tape, too many different people and demands that have to met by 1 or 2 Developers.
Posted by richyb on February 21, 2010 at 9:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Building a crtical mass for residential is vital for downtown to truly flourish...the Capitol Lofts would have been a welcome addition..what a shame...many Baton Rougean's don't know what density means...is BR a city or town?? Maybe an overgrown country town..just more of the status-quo
Maybe some type of mixed-use residential project can happen around the proposed Victory Park... some people won't be able to get their panties in a wad because it would be taller than 2-stories because it's in neither Spanish Town or Beauregard Town...
That above aerial rendering of downtown looks cool...it would be nice to see the skyline grow with those high-rises along the riverfront..
An entertainment anchor on the north-end of Third Street is a good idea...something besides another bar.
Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)