A lofty plan

http://media.businessreport.com/media/img/photos/2009/07/13/John-Sykes.vu_t290.jpg
A lofty plan

DRAWING THE LINE: John Sykes, Spanish Town’s representative on the city-parish Historic Preservation Commission, opposes Capitol Lofts, an apartment complex proposed for the end of North Sixth Street overlooking Arsenal Park.

Monday, July 13, 2009

When developer David Slaughter proposed a 115-unit apartment building on the edge of Spanish Town, the reaction from the neighborhood was swift and almost universally negative. There was nothing too surprising about that; neighborhood associations routinely oppose new developments in their backyards. And some of the concerns, like traffic, parking and drainage, are typical.

But Baton Rouge’s oldest neighborhood has a weapon most other communities don’t: a historic designation, and a panel to enforce it.

“The end of these fights always means that something historic gets bulldozed,” resident John Sykes. “I’m trying to draw the line for once.”

Sykes is Spanish Town’s representative on the city-parish Historic Preservation Commission, a fairly obscure body that in theory has the power to stop Capitol Lofts, planned for the end of North Sixth Street overlooking Arsenal Park. Spanish Town joined Drehr Place as an official parish historic district last spring, which means the commission must approve any new developments or demolitions.

Slaughter expects to go before the commission in August with a scaled-down, 67-unit version of the project. If denied, he can appeal to the Metro Council. This will be the first time the commission and the historic district ordinances have been tested by a significant development.

Several houses considered contributing elements to the neighborhood’s historic status would be demolished for the project, which is one of Sykes’ primary concerns. But he says any new construction is supposed to be compatible in scale, height, design and materials to the rest of the neighborhood, according to the relevant ordinance, and argues what he had seen so far of Capitol Lofts fails to meet those standards.

The commission had its first crack at Capitol Lofts on June 17. At the time, Slaughter had a date with planning and zoning the following Monday for a possible rezone from A4 [general residential] to A5 [high-rise apartment district], which would have been needed to build 115 units.

Advertisement | Advertising

The Downtown Development District commission had punted by then, saying they didn’t have enough information to support or oppose the development. Carolyn Bennett, a Historic Preservation Commission board member as well as the executive of the Foundation for Historical Louisiana, added the item to the HPC agenda, and invited Slaughter to attend.

“My read is he wants to do the right thing,” Bennett said at the meeting. “But the design that has been put forth at this time is not what everyone feels is the right thing.”

Some commission members and city-parish head planner Troy Bunch argued planning and zoning should deal with the issue first. Bunch said the historic commission has no jurisdiction until Slaughter applies for a certificate of appropriateness, and Slaughter still had a few hoops to jump through first, including a review of his site plan by planning commission staff and the Department of Public Works.

“It is premature for us to dissect this project until we have an application, because we don’t know what they are proposing,” Bunch said.

Sykes, with the support of perhaps a dozen Spanish Town residents packed into the cramped meeting room, disagreed. He argued the plans available at the time, and the A5 rezoning proposal specifically, clearly violate the historic district ordinance, and said the historic commission should tell the planning commission as much.

“Can we rationalize our guidelines with A5? I don’t think we can,” Sykes said.

“The sketch we gave is very preliminary,” Slaughter said. “We’re working with the neighborhood to try and reach a compromise. All options are still on the table.”

In the end, the historic commission voted to recommend planning and zoning put off its ruling, which is what happened. The Metro Council chamber was standing room only that evening, with many in the audience wearing pink [the pink flamingo is the unofficial mascot of Spanish Town] and holding homemade signs, some of which read, “Historic Spanish Town: Don’t Destroy It.” When the commission voted to defer, a muted cheer was heard, and then most of the crowd followed Historic Spanish Town Civic Association Chairman David Brown out of the room.

On July 8, Slaughter announced the new specs for Capitol Lofts: 67 units, including 18 one-bedrooms, 40 two-bedrooms, and nine three-bedrooms, all doable within the existing A4 zoning. The new design concept is four stories—not six—which is still bigger than the rest of Spanish Town. But the property sits at the bottom of a slope, and the height might be acceptable to some who objected to the original design.

“I feel that because of the discussion we had at our June meeting of the Historic Preservation commission, and because of the actions of the Spanish Town Civic Association and the Foundation [for Historical Louisiana], that’s why the backdown from A5 took place,” Bennett says. FHL has discussed the project, but its board has not taken a position.

Slaughter says the quality of the apartments will be comparable to something like The Millennium Towne Center, which charges from $995 to $1,220 for a one-bedroom, according to the Apartment Finder Web site.

“I’ve been looking to do a project like this downtown for a while,” he says. “The problem is there are only a few people who control property downtown.”

Downtown development has all the challenges of greenfield building, along with the difficulty of finding a large enough property that can be acquired for a reasonable price, he says. The lots making up the 1.7 acres where Capitol Lofts would be built mostly belong to Richard Preis, who agreed to become a partner in exchange for putting up the land. Preis is solely a land equity investor, Slaughter says, not the developer.

Slaughter says he knew about the historic designation from the beginning. “If this property was in the middle of Spanish Town, I would not try this project,” he says. But there’s already a two-story apartment building called Arsenal Park next door, and a commercial site where a 100-foot Louisiana Economic Development building is planned is nearby, he says.

DOWNSIZING: The new design for the Capitol Lofts apartment project has
been scaled back to 67 units in a
four-story building. The original concept called for 115 units in a six-story building.

DOWNSIZING: The new design for the Capitol Lofts apartment project has
been scaled back to 67 units in a
four-story building. The original concept called for 115 units in a six-story building.

Slaughter had considering applying for a new type of zoning under consideration by the city, an “infill small planned unit development,” or ISPUD, but decided trying to get an ISPUD might slow down his progress, and an unknown entity might scare the neighborhood, he says.

Rex Cabaniss, the project’s lead architect, was working on a new design; critics said the first concept looked more like Dallas than Spanish Town. The historic ordinance calls for new construction to be aesthetically similar to its surroundings, but how does an apartment building fit in with a neighborhood full of bungalow houses? He says the architects walked the streets to get a sense of the setbacks, window and entry placements, roof pitches and other details of the houses that could be reflected in the design.

“The challenge here is that the neighborhood allows A4 zoning, which allows a building of this scale,” Cabaniss says. “We are not trying to mimic the appearance of a single-family residence. The fact that it fronts the State Capitol park, in our view, makes it a different segment of Spanish Town, which is more in keeping with a building of this nature. This would not be the same building we would try to design for the center of Spanish Town.”

Building features will include stucco and wood siding, nonreflective glass, and “a small variety of muted finish colors to modulate the massing of the façade,” Slaughter says. He will ask for a variance to build past the setback line along State Capitol Drive, which would allow builders to push the lobby area forward and create a pedestrian-friendly front address. To compensate for areas that are past the line, he plans to set other areas further back.

Brown, the Spanish Town association chairman, is encouraged by Slaughter’s move to shrink the development’s scale, but stresses a smaller building doesn’t solve most of the issues.

“I understand they’re going to develop something, and I want to work with them. So far we haven’t worked with them much,” Brown says, adding the neighbors would have some ideas to offer if asked. “We’ve been hearing from them, and they appear to be listening to some extent. But they don’t appear willing to budge on the footprint of the structure, which would step right on top of seven historic homes.”

But perhaps the only way to avoid demolishing those buildings is to restore them [tax credits are available for restoration projects within a federal historic district like Spanish Town] and build townhomes or single-family homes alongside them, which is not part of the plan.

“We want something that blends in well with the rest of the neighborhood,” Brown says. “It’s a test case of our historic ordinance. It remains to be seen how much of a protection that is.”


Comments

Posted by loupegarou on July 14, 2009 at 12:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

1. No matter what, will bulldoze seven Historic District homes in addition to the eight Richard (High Above It All) Preis already tore down. In a few years, why would anybody wants to even visit neighborhood (like for Mardi Gras) if there's nothing but Perkins Rowe sheetrock crappe?

2. Ordinance mentioned forbids anything NEAR this size and density to be built in either Drehr Place or Spanish Town. Do Preis/Slaughter have the "connections" to make elected officials literally ignore written law and give them a variance? Preis is personally, truly despised. Slaughter is too new to this to have much stroke.

3. Midnight demolotions used to be tolerated. Now, thanks to Richard Preis and his secret Sunday tearing down Icehouse (just like Paramount Theater) to build his yet-to-be-started High Above It All, we have a demolition ordinance. We also have an ugly ordinance that applies only to Historic Districts. What are odds it will be plowed under and we'll be right back to same old same old?

Posted by richyb on July 14, 2009 at 5:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Given the location on the edge of Spanish Town at Arsenal Park... at only 4-stories; HEIGHT should NOT be a problem! The next block lies a dilapadated parking garage that used to house a 9 or 10 story office bldg; and plans are for a new Economic Development Bldg...also along the edge of Spanish Town is the ugly 14-story Presbyterian Apts(North St. @ Seventh)and the towering Galvez state bldg...so I'm not understanding an issue with height?? This project is virtually in the shadows of the Nations Tallest State Capitol(450')

When all is said and done I think most will be happy with Capitol Lofts...Many years back Southdown's civic Assoc. tried to stop a luxury condo development ...but finally the Crescent Condo's at University Lake happened..one of the nicest new developments in BR! Property values in the surrounding area's actually went UP!

BR is not a "city" when people get upset something is actually taller than 3 stories...BR still has a smaller "town" mentality. Lets just forget nice infil at the edge of the CBD..what BR really needs is more SPRAWL...these lofts probably need to be at BR's new downtown...Perkins Rowe...PLEASE!

It's never good to see Historic Bldgs go...WHO was responsible for demolishing the old Paramount Theatre?? That should never have happened.

Posted by Cajungrl on July 15, 2009 at 10:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This property most definitely needs to be developed. The downtown lots owned by Pries have been eyesores for years, black holes in a universe of progress. Unfortunately in downtown Baton Rouge "development" too often equals demolition (Istrouma Hotel, Paramount Theater, Garig Mansion, Sara Morgan's House, Zacharay Taylor's House, etc.). I am at a loss to understand why Mr.Slaughter feels that because the property is not in the "middle of Spanish Town" it is acceptable to dissassemble the 7 homes and thus destroy the historic nature of the area. When a new developer comes in, the properties adjacent to these apartments will no longer be in the middle of Spanish Town, they will be on the edge. Will that make it acceptable to then tear down or remove those properties?
The Historic Preservation Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission, AND the Metro Council approved the Historic Neighborhood Designation (including parameters for new construction) less than a year ago.
Is our community so fickle and so taken by new and shiny that we can't make an ordinance last 12 months?
Develop these properties in a manner that fits in with the scope and scale of the neighborhood. Take advantage of tax credits and save and restore these 7 historic homes. I know of a couple of vacant lots on River Road that could use some imagination and development.

Posted by cbauza on July 15, 2009 at 12:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The Spanish Town neighborhood is a maze of "thin" one-way streets and Spanish Town Road is the most obvious and easiest way to get out of the capitol area. There is 1(ONE) stop sign on the street and, when people see a green light on 9th street, it becomes a raceway endangering anyone, any child, any animal (pet or otherwise) who is in the way. If this development comes to pass - the streets, usually packed with parked cars, will become more dangerous than they are now when we have the odd hot-rod racing to make the light; not to mention the people who try to come up Spanish Town Rd. the wrong way.

The neighborhood "infrastructure" can handle a slow influx of people but to go from what we have now to an amount commensurate with a 67 (or 76) unit apartment building would be very dangerous for all (new or old) residents.

Posted by spanishtowner on July 15, 2009 at 2:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

When I bought my house in 1995 I had an entire block and a half of neighbors across the street and around the corner on the square block that is now DEQ (except for the one elderly lady who told me, quote, They can take me out of here in my coffin, unquote, and whose fenced off little house still sits close to the Galvez entrance). So, uh, according to Mr. Slaughter, it's alright for a private party to further encroach on the edge (as opposed to the middle) of the neighborhood because the State has the power to expropriate? Where does it stop? There'll always be an edge and another edge.

Let me please remind the downtown powers that be who are "taking no action" that at the neighborhood meeting of Plan BR Phase II on February 9th, the planners went on record as supporting the preservation of Historic Spanish Town! According to Chan Krieger Sieniewicz, urban planners hired out of Cambridge, Mass., it's considered a big selling point of the whole downtown revitalization, for Christ's sake!! The unique community! Its history and charm!

I, and most of us, fully understand and endorse there being more residential in the downtown area. But if little by little you destroy the one thing for the sake of the other, what do you have then? Bye-bye, selling point.

Posted by oldperson on July 15, 2009 at 4:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

There is more to property value than dollars. Spanish Town hung by a thread for many, many years and has finally seen a turn-around. Why would anyone think that destroying the very thing that saved it and makes it valuable (lovely homes, historical provenance, and unique character) is something to be desired? Mr. Slaughter whines about the lack of acquirable infill properties in downtown -- he needs to push the DDD to help him get his hands on those properties so he can infill to his heart's content. Downtown does need residential property and the City and the DDD need to work HARD to get it built. But Slaughter's plan stinks of taking the easy way out and unless the City stands by its own decisions, we ALL need to worry that our neighborhoods will become fodder for a Houston-esque vision of progress.

Posted by loupegarou on July 16, 2009 at 4:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Slaughter HAS been shown other properties. DDD showed him; so did a local realtor. Apparently, landowner Ricard Preis is his favored dance partner.

So, let's talk about Richard Preis.

He is the deep-pockets developer and public figure who wants you to "live high above it all" in condos on the Thirsty Tiger block.

Haven't noticed any high-rise condos behind the downtown Little Village? That's because he has yet to break ground; after years of trying to hawk "living high above it all."

For whatever reason he has yet to begin living high above it all (a delicious phrase because it so naggingly asks "above all what?"), he didn't pay much mind to the hippies and miscreants among the historic preservation set when they asked what he would do with an antebellum Icehouse on his block.

One Sunday, they got their answer. He smeared it into the concrete.

Even in a town that's fairly hard to outrage over bulldozing historic buildings, there was outrage; and the Council/Holden passed the first demolition permit rule. You can no longer "Richard Preis" a landmark without paying a hundred dollar fee.

Har-umpf!

Now, on to Spanish Town. When Preis bought the block next to the state Insurance building (1972 - 2004), the hippies and miscreants among the historic preservation set in Spanish Town got upset and told him, "You better not be planning to tear down that entire block of houses."

1991: Like they say on Hee-Haw, "Pfft, they were gone."

So, when Slaughter says the block where he wants to build his very own "high above it all" is half-empty; when he asks what's the harm in tearing down the other half of a block that's already denuded of its character and charm, ask him who started the fire that now laps the edges of Spanish Town.

It's his dance partner.

Post a comment

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Story Extras

Poll

Who will win Saturday's LSU-North Carolina football game?

See Results | Archives