Setting our priorities

Setting our priorities

Monday, January 14, 2008

Man, oh man, talk about your month to remember. What with New Year’s, LSU’s thumping of Ohio State, wunderkind Bobby Jindal’s inauguration and early Mardi Gras, we’re pretty much in the middle of a 36-day party in these parts. And from the booze-induced frenzy we’ve seen from Bourbon Street to Baton Rouge, many of these memories will be a tad hazy.

Thank goodness Ash Wednesday is Feb. 6 because we’re going to need 40 days to dry out. (Memo to self: Buy stock in whatever company makes Tylenol.)

Of course, the most important of these events in the public consciousness is the Tigers’ Buckeye beatdown to claim the school’s second BCS title. LSU, which now has three national titles overall, is the first team to wear the crown with two losses.

If you’re sorting out the dance card after that, it reads: Mardi Gras (what special session??), Jindal’s move to the governor’s mansion and Dick Clark’s rockin’ night.

Some political wonks will argue Jindal’s election and the hope he brings for a brighter day in our banana republic should get top billing, but get serious. The man moved his ethics reform special session so as not to go head-up against Mardi Gras—and who out there wouldn’t take another four years of Kathleen Blanco if the payoff was another national title for the Tigers?

Here’s your answer: Sorry Bobby, Coach is back in power.

Yet the reality once the lights go out and the party’s over is that we might have the nation’s best college football team but we’re the proud owner of a mediocre flagship institution.

I’m not one of those “the tail is wagging the dog” people, but isn’t it even the slightest bit embarrassing that we don’t have an academic institution our football team can be proud of?

What’s worse is those legislators who gobbled up tickets to the BCS Championship game and the governor who rode into the sunset from her luxury suite seemingly could care less.

A strong LSU football team is great for state morale and our self-image, but a powerhouse flagship institution is critical to the economy and the future of our state.

The post-hurricane world finds Louisiana flush with cash, yet the Pennington Biomedical Research Center remains largely ignored and LSU’s Baton Rouge campus is crumbling. Forget about the critical research facilities and laboratories needed to boost our knowledge-based economy; LSU can’t afford the $175 million needed to repair the buildings it already owns.

Clearly there’s more to a great institution than state-of-the-art buildings, but how many times in the past did we hear LSU couldn’t recruit great football players because of its outdated facilities? So we built one athletic Taj Mahal after another and guess what? We attracted the talent and have two national titles in five years to show for it.

Don’t you think the same logic applies to recruiting outstanding faculty? So with the state sitting on an estimated $2 billion surplus why do Pennington officials have to continually beg for the money to expand their world-renowned research facility and why is the flagship campus in shambles?

I can already hear the cries, “We can’t give LSU all that money, what about the 5,000 other four-year institutions in the state? Everybody deserves an equal cut—that’s our way!”

How’s “our way” working out?

If winning on the gridiron is a big enough deal for Gov. Blanco to declare a statewide “LSU Day,” then couldn’t one reasonably argue having a great flagship institution is at least equally important to Louisiana?

So, Mr. Jindal, if you want to make good on your promise of a better future, let’s get serious about funding LSU. Let’s make LSU so great that Baton Rouge’s next wunderkind doesn’t have to attend Brown University to get a world-class higher education.

I don’t know. Maybe I’m just drunk.


Comments

Posted by jaybee on January 18, 2008 at 12:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Amen! Maybe I'm biased since I've lived in the chemical city all my life and graduated from LSU, but we just don't need duplicate academic programs all over the state and so many different 4-year schools when our graduation/retention rates are still quite low.

Let's boost the flagship school, narrow the focus of the other universities in the state and solidify vocational options that the technical college system is providing. John Broussard

Posted by nopars on January 18, 2008 at 3:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So the secret to making LSU a better flagship institution is to spend more! I seem to hear that same old line every time teachers, bureaucrats and local school boards have meetings. The answer is always give me more money. LSU needs money but without those attached political strings (you know - keep tuition low, keep teaching my favorite irrelevant courses, don’t offer courses similar to my compass school’s programs, give me 4 good season tickets, hire my brother’s construction company, etc, etc). Otherwise we would need to radically increase spending to outspend what other states are spending on their flagship schools (assuming they won’t respond) to make LSU not just better relative to itself, but compared to other states’ schools. And ain’t that what is needed to make real progress?

Posted by backyardhell on January 18, 2008 at 4:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The one thing you can say about this column, it's NOT controversial. It's dead on.

How about a little investigative journalism into just what the graduation rates of the multitude of Louisiana colleges are??? (Won't everybody be really surprised how LITTLE their tax dollars are returning)

Posted by mpmarsiglia on January 21, 2008 at 2:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

OK, sure, let’s diminish the other Universities in the state on behalf of LSU. Many of the other universities have programs that are the best in the state and ranked high in the nation. This is especially true of UL Lafayette in Petroleum Engineering, Business Administration, and some of the technology specialties. I remember when UL Lafayette had a Computer Science program that was ranked 5th in the nation. Then LSU wanted their own program and funding was moved from UL (USL at that time) to LSU and now we have two programs neither of which is ranked as high as USL’s was prior to LSU demanding their own. Each university in the state should receive a fair proportion of funding to enable it to excel in specific areas. I think the UL System is doing that in how they manage the programs, but let’s not diminish the other schools to enhance LSU.

Posted by Tara on January 27, 2008 at 9:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Right again as usual JR.

Post a comment

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Story Extras

Poll

What best describes your spending habits for this Mother’s Day?

See Results | Archives



Click Here for Great Deals